Like most people, I have grown and changed a lot over the years, but there is one aspect of my personality that has always been a constant. When I find a new hobby or interest, I dive in headfirst and learn as much about the new subject as I possibly can. It can often have the effect of taking over my life for brief or long periods of time. My classmates in culinary school sometimes called me a “food encyclopedia”, because I spent so much time and energy reading about new ingredients & cuisines, and trying as many new dishes as possible. By the end of my schooling, some of my classmates came to me with certain questions instead of our chef instructor (I think they had a misplaced faith, as I had book knowledge, but not experience).
This same obsessive, wild abandon has followed me into my recent foray into blogging and travel writing. I have spent a considerable amount of time reading literature, online and off, about the subjects, and talking to anybody I can find who knows about either. Along the way, I came across Matador Network, which is a great resource. It is a blog server, similar to WordPress or Blogspot, etc, but it is also a forum and community for travelers, travel writers and travel bloggers.
There were a pair of articles I found a couple weeks ago on that website that I found particularly intriguing. Between the two of them, they discuss words and phrases that they think should stop being used in travel writing. The articles can be found here and here Don’t worry, they’re both rather short, but I highly encourage you to read them, even if you don’t intend on doing any travel writing in the future, because you can probably relate.
I can understand why they would say these things shouldn’t appear in travel writing. They are cheesy, over-used cliches. And they rarely actually give any important or interesting details. I was pleased after reading them, because I realized that I had never actually said any of this stuff in any of my blogging on here. That made me feel fairly proud, since it wasn’t something I had even considered. I can be prone to hyperbole sometimes, but I stress using my own words, and very rarely rely on cheesy metaphors, choosing instead to paint descriptive pictures or real events and surroundings when I share anecdotes.
These posts have made me think about things that I would like to add to the list.
1. A Study in Contrasts
I have seen this phrase used to describe just about every location in the world I have ever read travel writing about. The reason for this is simple : You could reasonably say that about anywhere in the world. Within any given culture, you will find people from all walks of life, with a myriad of personalities and world-views. Saying a place is a study in contrasts is merely saying that it is a place with a diverse group of people belonging to the same culture. That is not a description, and it means nothing.
2. Where East Meets West
What the hell does this mean? Singapore is supposedly where East meets West, because while they have supposedly “westernized” in many ways, they still hold onto the eastern values they have learned from the local Malays, and the Indian and Chinese immigrants that have made Singapore their home. The same has been said about Malaysia. I have seen this phrase used to describe Uzbekistan and other places in Central Asia (or even the Middle East) because they lay in between the traditional “eastern” and “western” worlds. The thought process is that if a place has been influenced by both western and eastern culture to one degree or another, then it is a spot “where east meets west”. I call bullshit. By this logic, you could say the same thing about Seattle, Mexico City, Paris, Egypt, and many other places. There are Asian and European influences in all of these places, which is generally what people mean by East and West.
My problem with this statement is two-fold, and while the geographically ridiculous aspect is one of them, it’s not the most important. The thing that bothers me the most with this phrase and way of thinking is this : it destroys the autonomy of local culture. It seems ridiculously offensive to me to say that a country’s culture is really just a collection of the cultures around them. One could say that Afghanistan is a place “where east meets west” because it is located on the historical spice route and silk road. You could say that because Indians and Chinese passed through on their way to the Middle East and Europe, and then returned by the same route, Afghanistan is a mix of those cultures. But that is selling them short. You are implying that there is nothing unique and original that comes from within their borders, but that they are merely a mix of other places. There is no way that that concept could be true of anywhere in the world. Every culture has their own unique aspects, but they have all also been influenced by their surroundings, and those they have made contact with. Stop selling places short. Describe in detail some of the cultures that have influenced a place, but then discuss what’s unique about them that didn’t come from those influences. You will be giving much more credit to the place you are writing about.
3. A City/Country of Superlatives
Anywhere in the world can be said to be the best at something. Argentina has the best steak/beef in the world. Japan has the highest suicide rate / cutest mascots. Seattle does coffee better than anybody else (Smarter Travel actually lists us as #2, but I will hold my ground until proven wrong), and Norway has the happiest people in the world. It’s great to the have the most of something, or to be the best at something, and these accomplishments should be mentioned when you’re writing about a location, but saying that a city is a place of superlatives just sounds cheesy. Mainly because everybody says that about everywhere. Think of something new.
4. Interesting Dichotomy Found Here
This really isn’t that much different from the concept behind the “Study in Contrasts” concept. No culture is homogeneous. There are all sorts of people, and while they can be extremely different from each other, they will be slightly bound by the local culture that they belong to. There are aspects that will be similar or the same, but there will be a lot of differences. There will be conservatives, liberals, and those in between. Some people will be friendly, while others are a little more reserved with strangers. This does not constitute a dichotomy, because there will be certain cultural aspects that they will share in common. These people are not contradicting each other, they are just a little bit different.
5. The City / Country Strides into the Future While Holding Hands with the Past, (or similar ways of saying the same thing.)
This might as well be “Where the past meets the future”, which is just as great of a statement as “Where the East meets the West”. You would be hard pressed to find a place in the world that doesn’t want to grow, learn, progress and improve. You would just as likely have a difficult time finding a place that has entirely rejected their traditional customs and culture. People all over the world realize that there are pros and cons to accepting ideas from around the world, as well as to their traditions. Finding a balance between improving things and respecting what has come before is the norm around the world. Anywhere you go, you will find new building side by side with really old buildings. That is not unique. Stop trying to focus on that, and just give an accurate description of where you are.
Most of these phrases show up in guidebooks, and go a long way to explaining why I have decided that guides are just a waste of time. They all seem intent on trying to sell places to me, by exaggerating, and trying to blow things up out of proportion. I don’t care about any of this stuff, and I believe any independent-minded traveler is in agreement with me. Your focus should no longer be on trying to sell me on a spot, but instead should show an unbiased picture of the positive and negative aspects of a destination. That way I can make my own decision from concrete information. That’s what I look for in travel writing. When I see these phrases, it is just a turn off to me.
I once was really intrigued by the idea of visiting Amsterdam. Sitting on my bookcase is a guidebook to the city, which I recently decided to read (since I was in between books, and didn’t have anything else to fall back on). Reading that guide made me decide that Amsterdam doesn’t seem the slightest bit interesting, mainly because they used almost all of these cliches. I might be making too strong of a jump in the wrong direction, but now somebody will have to prove me wrong.
Join Amazon Prime – Watch Over 40,000 Movies & TV Shows Anytime – Start Free Trial Now